IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v185y2022i2p319-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commentary – Should Washington Have Pressed Kyiv Into A Compromise With Moscow?

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Umland

Abstract

This article was submitted in late 2021, and became dated after Russia's demonstrative preparation as well as start of an open, large‐scale invasion of Ukraine early 2022. We nevertheless publish this commentary here in order to document the debate about the events leading to the escalation. No adaptations to the original 2021 article were made after the outbreak of high‐intensity war on 24 February 2022. Avoiding a larger military escalation in the Russian–Ukrainian conflict is an important aim. Yet, historical experience suggests that concessions by Ukraine or its Western partners toward Russian revanchist aspirations in the Donbas may not help achieve it. On the contrary, Western softness, and Ukrainian weakness vis‐à‐vis the Kremlin will lead to further confrontation. Si bien evitar una escalada militar mayor es un objetivo importante, la experiencia histórica sugiere que las concesiones de Ucrania o sus socios occidentales hacia las aspiraciones revanchistas rusas en el Donbass pueden no ayudar a lograrlo. Por el contrario, la blandura occidental y la debilidad de Ucrania frente al Kremlin conducirán a una mayor confrontación. 尽管避免更大的军事升级是一项重要目标, 但历史经验暗示, 乌克兰或其西方伙伴在顿巴斯对俄罗斯的复仇野心所作的妥协可能不会实现这一目标。相反, 与克里姆林宫相比, 西方的软弱性和乌克兰的劣势将导致进一步对峙。

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Umland, 2022. "Commentary – Should Washington Have Pressed Kyiv Into A Compromise With Moscow?," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(2), pages 319-330, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:2:p:319-330
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200221084699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221084699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200221084699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:2:p:319-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.