IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v185y2022i1p207-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review Essay

Author

Listed:
  • Nairita Roy Chaudhuri

Abstract

This essay reviews ecological economist, Giorgos Kallis’ recent book, ‘Why Malthus Was Wrong and Why Environmentalists Should Care’ (2019) to review the debate around population and sustainability. In the name of sustainability and resource scarcity, debates on population tend to blame the poor without adequately problematizing structural inequalities that sustain racial capitalism and stimulate scarcity. This narrative is a remnant of the Malthusian thesis that problematized population growth in relation to food scarcity without problematizing utilitarian human wants. In this essay, I review this book because the author expands on the politics of scarcity and urges us to nurture ethics and the politics of limits. My contribution in this extended review comes in offering a perspective from post‐colonial countries like India, and in the global South more broadly, that align with ‘other’ notions of limits, the good life, and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nairita Roy Chaudhuri, 2022. "Review Essay," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(1), pages 207-225, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:1:p:207-225
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200211065134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200211065134
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200211065134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:1:p:207-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.