IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/wirecc/v10y2019i2ne00567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Judah Cohen
  • Dim Coumou
  • Jessica Hwang
  • Lester Mackey
  • Paulo Orenstein
  • Sonja Totz
  • Eli Tziperman

Abstract

The discipline of seasonal climate prediction began as an exercise in simple statistical techniques. However, today the large government forecast centers almost exclusively rely on complex fully coupled dynamical forecast systems for their subseasonal to seasonal (S2S) predictions while statistical techniques are mostly neglected and those techniques still in use have not been updated in decades. In this Opinion Article, we argue that new statistical techniques mostly developed outside the field of climate science, collectively referred to as machine learning, can be adopted by climate forecasters to increase the accuracy of S2S predictions. We present an example of where unsupervised learning demonstrates higher accuracy in a seasonal prediction than the state‐of‐the‐art dynamical systems. We also summarize some relevant machine learning methods that are most applicable to climate prediction. Finally, we show by comparing real‐time dynamical model forecasts with observations from winter 2017/2018 that dynamical model forecasts are almost entirely insensitive to polar vortex (PV) variability and the impact on sensible weather. Instead, statistical forecasts more accurately predicted the resultant sensible weather from a mid‐winter PV disruption than the dynamical forecasts. The important implication from the poor dynamical forecasts is that if Arctic change influences mid‐latitude weather through PV variability, then the ability of dynamical models to demonstrate the existence of such a pathway is compromised. We conclude by suggesting that S2S prediction will be most beneficial to the public by incorporating mixed or a hybrid of dynamical forecasts and updated statistical techniques such as machine learning. This article is categorized under: Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models

Suggested Citation

  • Judah Cohen & Dim Coumou & Jessica Hwang & Lester Mackey & Paulo Orenstein & Sonja Totz & Eli Tziperman, 2019. "S2S reboot: An argument for greater inclusion of machine learning in subseasonal to seasonal forecasts," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:10:y:2019:i:2:n:e00567
    DOI: 10.1002/wcc.567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/wcc.567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soukayna Mouatadid & Paulo Orenstein & Genevieve Flaspohler & Judah Cohen & Miruna Oprescu & Ernest Fraenkel & Lester Mackey, 2023. "Adaptive bias correction for improved subseasonal forecasting," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Lei Chen & Xiaohui Zhong & Hao Li & Jie Wu & Bo Lu & Deliang Chen & Shang-Ping Xie & Libo Wu & Qingchen Chao & Chensen Lin & Zixin Hu & Yuan Qi, 2024. "A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:wirecc:v:10:y:2019:i:2:n:e00567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1757-7799 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.