IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v60y2021i4p406-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value‐Added Services at Dry Ports: Balancing the Perspectives of Different Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Alena Khaslavskaya
  • Violeta Roso
  • Ivan Sanchez‐Diaz
  • Ceren Altuntas Vural

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate which dry port services generate the greatest positive impact on stakeholders and their objectives. Stakeholders identified from the literature are the dry ports, the dry port’s municipality/region, the seaport, shippers, shipping lines, rail operators, and road operators. A method based on multi‐actor multi‐criteria analysis is applied to allow the evaluation of different scenarios considering the objectives and opinions of multiple stakeholders. The findings show that the basic services of the dry ports studied are crucial to establishing initial operations. Expanding the service portfolio by adding a wider range of customer‐oriented value‐added services generates extra economic and environmental benefits for stakeholders. The results expand the understanding on stakeholder benefits from the diversified range of dry port services, while the inclusion of multiple stakeholders in the analysis acknowledges the heterogeneity in stakeholder perceptions. Finally, this methodology enables the creation of an extensive set of criteria and indicators for dry port evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso & Ivan Sanchez‐Diaz & Ceren Altuntas Vural, 2021. "Value‐Added Services at Dry Ports: Balancing the Perspectives of Different Stakeholders," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 406-438, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:60:y:2021:i:4:p:406-438
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.60.4.0406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.60.4.0406
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.60.4.0406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:60:y:2021:i:4:p:406-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.