IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v57y2018i2p193-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Relative Efficiency of Highway Safety Investments on Commercial Transportation

Author

Listed:
  • Yao‐Te Tsai
  • Stephen M. Swartz
  • Fadel M. Megahed

Abstract

Highway safety has been one of the most important public policy issues discussed in recent years. Accidents involving commercial vehicles result in many negative effects, both personal and economic. Although the numbers of highway accidents have been declining in the past decade, many people still suffer from the effects of severe highway accidents. As public policymakers struggle to improve safety on our highway system, they are looking for analytical tools to help them assess and leverage the impact of scarce public resources. This research effort used data envelopment analysis (DEA) for benchmarking the efficiency of public policy factors (regulatory and financial) known to have an influence on safety performance. The results of this research can provide objective safety performance and improvement recommendations for commercial transportation and therefore serve to be instructive to those states with lower levels of safety performance. Our findings suggest that government agencies could focus on more effective policymaking (emphasizing road condition improvement and capital outlay utilization vs. other investments) to reduce highway fatality rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao‐Te Tsai & Stephen M. Swartz & Fadel M. Megahed, 2018. "Estimating the Relative Efficiency of Highway Safety Investments on Commercial Transportation," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(2), pages 193-218, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:2:p:193-218
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0193
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.57.2.0193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:57:y:2018:i:2:p:193-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.