IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v55y2016i2p149-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology, Firm Size, and Safety: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the US Motor‐carrier Industry

Author

Listed:
  • David E. Cantor
  • Thomas M. Corsi
  • Curtis M. Grimm
  • Prabhjot Singh

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between motor‐carrier firm size and safety outcomes. Leveraging insights from the resource‐based view of the firm, we develop hypotheses regarding this important relationship. To test our hypotheses, we constructed an original commercial motor‐carrier safety database, drawing on data from the Motor Carrier Management Information System and the Safety Measurement System. The results demonstrate that there is a significant and positive relationship between firm size and safety performance as measured through a carrier's number of crashes, unsafe driving violations, hours‐of‐service compliance, and vehicle maintenance violations. The impact of firm size on safety performance varies according to industry segment. This study has important academic and public policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • David E. Cantor & Thomas M. Corsi & Curtis M. Grimm & Prabhjot Singh, 2016. "Technology, Firm Size, and Safety: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the US Motor‐carrier Industry," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 149-167, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:2:p:149-167
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.55.2.0149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:55:y:2016:i:2:p:149-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.