IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v54y2015i4p496-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inland Intermodal Terminals Location Criteria Evaluation: The Case of Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Violeta Roso
  • Nikolina Brnjac
  • Borna Abramovic

Abstract

Determining a suitable location for an intermodal terminal is a critical element of the terminal establishment process, a decision on which the functionality of the entire intermodal freight distribution chain depends. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the criteria used for deciding on suitable locations for intermodal terminals in Croatia. First, quality indicators of intermodal terminals were identified: flexibility, safety and security, reliability, time, and accessibility. Based on these quality indicators, and in compliance with the European traffic policy and efficient functioning of intermodal transport, location criteria were formed and evaluated: legislative, environmental, goods flows, spatial, technical‐technological, and organizational. Each criterion is divided further into subcriteria and evaluated using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. The results of the study show that the criterion of goods flows has the most significant impact on the selection of the terminal location, followed by the spatial criterion. A position that connects to the European traffic corridor network is essential for a Croatian terminal's success.

Suggested Citation

  • Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac & Borna Abramovic, 2015. "Inland Intermodal Terminals Location Criteria Evaluation: The Case of Croatia," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 496-515, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:4:p:496-515
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0496
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.54.4.0496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:4:p:496-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.