IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v54y2015i3p291-311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publication Productivity in the Supply Chain Management Discipline: 2011–13

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Maloni
  • Craig Carter
  • Lutz Kaufmann
  • Zachary Rogers

Abstract

This article continues an established series of analyses across 48 years of institutional research productivity in supply chain management (SCM) journals, ranking the top 25 schools producing SCM research in 2011–13, in comparison to previous editions of the study. The current results illustrate that a core set of SCM academic institutions consistently retain strong research productivity, ranking in the top 10 across decades. However, there is significant variability in the remaining top 25 in comparison to previous editions, which is corroborated by an analysis of the concentration (i.e., diversity) of authors in the discipline that indicates that a greater number of authors and institutions continue to contribute SCM publications. However, this diversity is concentrated primarily among North American institutions as international institutions are not increasing publication productivity in the established journal set. Ultimately, the combined results provide a benchmark of the current status of the SCM discipline and present insights into its continued maturation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Maloni & Craig Carter & Lutz Kaufmann & Zachary Rogers, 2015. "Publication Productivity in the Supply Chain Management Discipline: 2011–13," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 291-311, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:3:p:291-311
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.54.3.0291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.54.3.0291
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.54.3.0291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:54:y:2015:i:3:p:291-311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.