IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v52y2013i2p264-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Disruptions Are Inevitable—Get READI: Resiliency Enhancement Analysis via Deletion and Insertion

Author

Listed:
  • Terry P. Harrison
  • P. J. Houm
  • Douglas J. Thomas
  • Christopher W. Craighead

Abstract

Companies have increasingly turned to the use of optimization to create value and drive efficiencies in their supply chains. However, this practice also exposes the firm to increased levels of risk stemming from supply chain disruptions which can be quite costly relative to both short‐ and long‐term performance. In response, companies need to build and maintain resilience to combat these disruptive events. Yet managers struggle with how to build resilience and where to focus resiliency enhancements. This article proposes a versatile optimization approach, READI—Resiliency Enhancement Analysis via Deletion (of key supply chain node, flow, or activity) and Insertion (of mitigation strategy), and demonstrates this approach on the supply chain of a major consumer products company. READI can be enlightening relative to both descriptive insights, such as the criticality of supply chain nodes and current levels of network resilience, and prescriptive insights, such as where to implement resiliency enhancements.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry P. Harrison & P. J. Houm & Douglas J. Thomas & Christopher W. Craighead, 2013. "Supply Chain Disruptions Are Inevitable—Get READI: Resiliency Enhancement Analysis via Deletion and Insertion," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(2), pages 264-276, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:52:y:2013:i:2:p:264-276
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.52.2.0264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.52.2.0264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.52.2.0264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:52:y:2013:i:2:p:264-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.