IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v50y2011i2p176-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Competitiveness of Ports as Bunkering Hubs: Empirical Studies on Singapore and Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
  • Desiree Chen
  • Fan Cheng
  • Kevin Wong

Abstract

Bunkering, that is, supplying ships with fuel, has gained strategic importance in port and shipping businesses. This article formulates a framework and a method for assessing the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs and includes empirical studies on the ports of Singapore and Shanghai. Ten attributes for the selection of a bunkering port were identified based on interview with practitioners. Through surveys, ship operators and managers ranked the importance of these attributes. Bunker quality was found to be the most important attribute. The respondents also assessed Singapore and Shanghai ports based on the ten attributes. The performances of both ports were analyzed according to their score on each attribute and the total weighted scores. Singapore was rated a better performer in the assessment. Besides Singapore's naturally strategic location, which attracts large cargo volume, the fundamental reason for its excellent performance is its liberal market structure, which results in attractive pricing and efficient practices. In this study, recommendations are given to port authorities and operators, with special focus on ports of Singapore and Shanghai.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Desiree Chen & Fan Cheng & Kevin Wong, 2011. "Assessment of the Competitiveness of Ports as Bunkering Hubs: Empirical Studies on Singapore and Shanghai," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 176-203, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:50:y:2011:i:2:p:176-203
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.50.2.0176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.50.2.0176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.50.2.0176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:50:y:2011:i:2:p:176-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.