IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v9y2006i1p35-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaches and requirements to develop and improve the standard processes for a research and development organization

Author

Listed:
  • Young Ha Hwang
  • Jong‐Geun Park

Abstract

With the increased complexity of man‐made systems and software and the higher quality R&D results that are expected in today's R&D environment, it has become increasingly necessary to effectively define and improve the R&D standard processes specifically tailored for our organization and projects. To meet these needs, we have defined R&D standard processes based on international standards for systems and software engineering and on our existing traditional work methods, and then applied them to our ongoing projects. Now, we are improving our defined R&D standard processes continuously by monitoring of our processes and products and checking feedback from application results. In this paper, we introduce the R&D standard processes developed by our organization, the E Research Institute in Korea, and define the requirements and approaches used for their development and improvement. We compare our defined R&D standard processes with ISO/IEC 15288, which is the international standards for systems engineering, and summarize what we have learned through the development and improvement of our processes. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 9: 35–44, 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Young Ha Hwang & Jong‐Geun Park, 2006. "Approaches and requirements to develop and improve the standard processes for a research and development organization," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 35-44, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:9:y:2006:i:1:p:35-44
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20041
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James N. Martin, 2000. "Processes for engineering a system: an overview of the ANSI/EIA 632 standard and its heritage," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francis Vanek & Peter Jackson & Richard Grzybowski, 2008. "Systems engineering metrics and applications in product development: A critical literature review and agenda for further research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 107-124, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory C. Smoots, 2018. "Textual analysis of defects in engineering documentation via systematic decision execution," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 358-371, July.
    2. Johan Bendz & Harold W. Lawson, 2001. "A model for deploying life‐cycle process standards in the change management of complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 107-117.
    3. Stuart Arnold & Harold W. Lawson, 2004. "Viewing systems from a business management perspective: The ISO/IEC 15288 standard," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 229-242.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:9:y:2006:i:1:p:35-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.