IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v7y2004i3p243-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The First Requirements Elucidator Demonstration (FRED) tool

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph E. Kasser

Abstract

The problem of poorly written requirements has been documented for at least the last ten years without much improvement. This paper describes applying technology in the form of a simple software tool containing an Expert System that can minimize the production of poorly worded requirements in the future and help ensure the completeness of the testing of poorly worded requirements. This paper also describes how the tool evolved and discusses how the tool can be used to prevent cost and schedule escalations due to some types of poorly worded requirements. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 7: 243–256, 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph E. Kasser, 2004. "The First Requirements Elucidator Demonstration (FRED) tool," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 243-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:3:p:243-256
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yvonne Bijan & Junfang Yu & Jerrell Stracener & Timothy Woods, 2013. "Systems requirements engineering—State of the methodology," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 267-276, September.
    2. Romulo B. Magnaye & Brian J. Sauser & Jose E. Ramirez‐Marquez, 2010. "System development planning using readiness levels in a cost of development minimization model," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 311-323, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:7:y:2004:i:3:p:243-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.