IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v20y2017i4p307-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociotechnical System Safety: Hierarchical Control versus Mindfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Gavan Lintern
  • Peter N. Kugler

Abstract

Both the hierarchical control model of organizational processes in a sociotechnical system and organizational mindfulness have been promoted, largely through independent lines of argument, as having potential to improve safety in large‐scale sociotechnical systems. We review the arguments to assess the confidence we might place in these claims and to assess whether these views are necessarily incompatible or could be complementary. Our analysis reveals a lack of consistency in the arguments for hierarchical control. It remains unclear whether application of this model to sociotechnical system design will enhance safety or will even degrade it by promoting micromanagement. We conclude that the type of mindfulness that bolsters important safety‐related cognitive processes is just what is missing from the hierarchical control model. The safety of large‐scale sociotechnical systems with catastrophic potential poses an enormous challenge. A functional model with some hierarchical properties, when complemented with insights relating to organizational mindfulness, offers an innovative way of working toward resolving that challenge. We review and contrast the potential contributions of hierarchical control model and organizational mindfulness to safety in large‐scale sociotechnical systems. We conclude that formulations of the hierarchical control model do not address the challenges posed by unanticipated events and that, to be effective, safety management must integrate mindful cognitive processes into their hierarchical structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Gavan Lintern & Peter N. Kugler, 2017. "Sociotechnical System Safety: Hierarchical Control versus Mindfulness," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 307-317, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:307-317
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21396
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21396?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iedema, Roderick Aren Michael & Jorm, Christine & Braithwaite, Jeffrey & Travaglia, Jo & Lum, Martin, 2006. "A root cause analysis of clinical error: Confronting the disjunction between formal rules and situated clinical activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 1201-1212, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    2. Nicolini, Davide & Waring, Justin & Mengis, Jeanne, 2011. "Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: Mind the gap," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 217-225, July.
    3. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano & Letizia Agostini & Anna Guerrieri & Mirella Angaramo & Franco Ripa, 2020. "L?analisi a priori del rischio sanitario in Regione Piemonte: applicazione del metodo Cartorisk sull?area materno-infantile," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(114), pages 67-88.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:20:y:2017:i:4:p:307-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.