IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v18y2015i1p59-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing the Impact of Requirements Volatility on Systems Engineering Effort

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Peña
  • Ricardo Valerdi

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a study aimed at increasing the understanding of the causes of requirements volatility, its impact on systems engineering effort, and its changing dynamics over the system life cycle. The objective of the research is to improve the ability of systems engineers to anticipate and manage the effects of changing requirements. The ultimate goal of this study is to develop a model for quantifying the impact of requirements volatility on systems engineering effort that can be incorporated into the Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model. Based on a review of the literature and expert judgment collected through surveys in five workshops, we identify five observations that summarize the key considerations of requirements volatility. First, a set of project organizational, technical, and contextual factors were ranked by subject matter experts in terms of their influence on requirements volatility. Their responses point to poor initial understanding of the system and customer needs as the leading cause of requirements volatility. Second, our results suggest that, while volatility tends to decrease over time, the number of requirements changes may increase during transitions between life cycle phases. Third, requirements volatility increases the functional size of the project and causes rework of engineering products, driving an increase in systems engineering effort. Fourth, the effect of requirements volatility on systems engineering effort increases the later the change occurs in the system life cycle. Fifth, the effort impact of a requirements change varies depending on the type of change (added, deleted, and modified).

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Peña & Ricardo Valerdi, 2015. "Characterizing the Impact of Requirements Volatility on Systems Engineering Effort," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 59-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:59-70
    DOI: 10.1111/sys.21288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/sys.21288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/sys.21288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry Boehm & Ricardo Valerdi & Eric Honour, 2008. "The ROI of systems engineering: Some quantitative results for software‐intensive systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 221-234, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jared Fortune & Ricardo Valerdi, 2013. "A framework for reusing systems engineering products," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 304-312, September.
    2. Clement Smartt & Susan Ferreira, 2011. "Advancing systems engineering in support of the bid and proposal process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 255-266, September.
    3. Charlotte N. Dunford & Mike Yearworth & Darren M. York & Patrick Godfrey, 2013. "A view of Systems Practice: Enabling quality in design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 134-151, June.
    4. Michael W. Grenn & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "The Requirements Entropy Framework in Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 462-478, December.
    5. Mohamad Kassab & Giuseppe Destefanis, 2017. "Requirements Effort Estimation: The State of the Practice," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 43, pages 87-102.
    6. Clement Smartt & Susan Ferreira, 2012. "Constructing a general framework for systems engineering strategy," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 140-152, June.
    7. Ricardo Valerdi & Matthew Dabkowski & Indrajeet Dixit, 2015. "Reliability Improvement of Major Defense Acquisition Program Cost Estimates—Mapping DoDAF to COSYSMO," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(5), pages 530-547, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:18:y:2015:i:1:p:59-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.