IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v10y2007i1p45-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How lessons learned from using QFD led to the evolution of a process for creating quality requirements for complex systems

Author

Listed:
  • Amihud Hari
  • Joseph E. Kasser
  • Menachem P. Weiss

Abstract

While the requirements document is an important product, and the importance of good requirements has often been stated, little attention has been given in the systems engineering literature as to the application of published techniques for eliciting requirements for new products. It is likely that this lack will be remedied in the future, and many of those techniques will be adopted and published in the systems engineering literature. However, just reusing those tools for creating specifications for complex systems is as fraught as the reuse of software without investigating the context from where the proposed reusable module was taken from and its suitability for use in the new context. This paper addresses that issue, in the context of Quality Function Deployment (QFD), which has been used in the commercial arena to elucidate and negotiate requirements for new products for at least 20 years. QFD has a lot to offer with respect to new products, but when used to specify the requirements for complex systems, has been found to have a number of deficiencies. This paper summarizes the top six lessons learned from 15 years of experience in using QFD in the elicitation, elucidation, and negotiation of requirements for complex systems and documents a process for creating requirements by identifying the customer's needs and transforming them into well‐written requirements. The most important contributions made by this paper are the modifications to QFD in the form of the decision table and the evolution of QFD into a process for defining requirements for complex systems named Quality Requirements Definition (QRD). © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 10: 45–63, 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Amihud Hari & Joseph E. Kasser & Menachem P. Weiss, 2007. "How lessons learned from using QFD led to the evolution of a process for creating quality requirements for complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages 45-63, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:45-63
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Wood & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi & Timothy Eveleigh, 2013. "A framework for capturing the hidden stakeholder system," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 251-266, September.
    2. Timothy D. Blackburn & Thomas A. Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2012. "Using a TRIZ framework for systems engineering trade studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 355-367, September.
    3. A. M. M. Sharif Ullah & Jun'ichi Tamaki, 2011. "Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 154-172, June.
    4. Magnus Eriksson & Kjell Borg & Jürgen Börstler, 2008. "Use Cases for Systems Engineering—An Approach and Empirical Evaluation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 39-60, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:45-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.