IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v7y1999i3p151-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory practice in the context of Local Agenda 21: a case study evaluation of experience in three English local authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Wild

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Robert Marshall

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

Abstract

This paper examines the different ways in which the participatory principles of Agenda 21 are being put into practice in the UK, by reference to research in three 'progressive' localities: Kirklees, Leicester and Mendip. The investigation includes an examination of the reasons why a participatory approach is being adopted, how the local authorities are engaging the public in Local Agenda 21 (the levels, methods and scope of participation) and how effective their approaches have been. The research reveals that a variety of participatory methods and techniques are being employed at various scales. The three authorities emphasize a listening and open approach to the decision-making process, but despite their commitment to participation there had been limited success in securing widespread involvement of people, and especially disadvantaged groups, in the process. Key issues to emerge are the importance of the commitment of key elected representatives and the need for participation to be an ongoing commitment with a preparedness to begin with 'where people are at' rather than to set aspirations too high. The implications are that change is needed in the way local authorities relate to the communities they serve, but this will place considerable demands on already stretched local authority resources, particularly where positive action is needed to 'build capacity'. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Wild & Robert Marshall, 1999. "Participatory practice in the context of Local Agenda 21: a case study evaluation of experience in three English local authorities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(3), pages 151-162.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:7:y:1999:i:3:p:151-162
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199908)7:3<151::AID-SD111>3.0.CO;2-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Manta Conroy & Philip R Berke, 2004. "What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(8), pages 1381-1396, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:7:y:1999:i:3:p:151-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.