IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i1p1298-1314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Q‐methodology for policy research and stakeholder engagement to strengthen public health in large‐scale mining in Mozambique

Author

Listed:
  • Joschka J. Proksik
  • Fritz Brugger
  • Hermínio Cossa
  • Leonardo Chavane
  • Eusébio Macete

Abstract

Mining projects can have adverse effects on public health, potentially impacting the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. While environmental impacts are typically addressed through mandatory environmental impact assessments, public health consequences often receive inadequate attention, despite being a major concern for affected communities. Policy instruments for mitigating these public health issues, including health impact assessment (HIA), remain underutilized, particularly in Africa. We conduct a Q‐methodology study in Mozambique to (1) identify policy preferences of government, private sector, and civil society stakeholders for regulating public health in large‐scale mining projects; and (2) to actively engage local stakeholders in a national‐level dialogue on strengthening public health in impact assessment practise. The findings were successfully used to initiate and inform a policy dialogue in cooperation with local public health professionals and public health institutions, as well as policymakers in the respective ministries.

Suggested Citation

  • Joschka J. Proksik & Fritz Brugger & Hermínio Cossa & Leonardo Chavane & Eusébio Macete, 2025. "Using Q‐methodology for policy research and stakeholder engagement to strengthen public health in large‐scale mining in Mozambique," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1298-1314, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:1298-1314
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3175
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:1:p:1298-1314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.