IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i6p6836-6863.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived adequacy of policy instruments reveals weak targets in the Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Omar A. Guerrero
  • Daniele Guariso
  • Gonzalo Castañeda

Abstract

We report the results of a novel worldwide survey on how adequate are existing policy instruments (if any) across the 169 targets of the Sustainable Development Goals. By obtaining more than 130,000 responses about 146 countries from more than 7000 experts, a large‐scale picture of the existence and adequacy of policy instruments emerges. This survey provides the first dataset depicting the current state of the world according to how well prepared (in terms of instruments) are countries and regions to tackle the challenges posed by the 2030 Agenda. We combine these data with the official UN SDG indicators and identify targets that systematically exhibit weaknesses in their historical performance and the adequacy of the available policy instrument, revealing key policy issues that need to be prioritised through interventions that go beyond the allocation of financial resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar A. Guerrero & Daniele Guariso & Gonzalo Castañeda, 2024. "Perceived adequacy of policy instruments reveals weak targets in the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6836-6863, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:6:p:6836-6863
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:6:p:6836-6863. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.