IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i5p5499-5512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ASEAN's efficiency scores in achieving the sustainable development goals

Author

Listed:
  • Jin‐Li Hu
  • Ya‐Chi Cheng

Abstract

With limited government resources, achieving all 17 SDGs by 2030 is challenging, and it would be best to prioritize the implementation of the SDGs. This study applies the SBM model of DEA to compare ASEAN with closely interacting countries. Using DEA can identify the characteristics of efficient decision‐making units (i.e., efficient countries), identify the relatively inefficient SDGs of ASEAN and the best practice peer countries, and determine the SDGs that need to be improved in the short term and the target countries to be emulated. This study further compares the efficiency of ASEAN and non‐ASEAN countries, high‐income countries, and other countries, before and after the outbreak of Covid‐19, to gain more policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin‐Li Hu & Ya‐Chi Cheng, 2024. "ASEAN's efficiency scores in achieving the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5499-5512, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5499-5512
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2981
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:5:p:5499-5512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.