IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i4p3722-3735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory study of stakeholder views on the sustainable development of mountain tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Annarita Colasante
  • Idiano D'Adamo
  • Alfredo De Massis
  • Simone Italiano

Abstract

Sustainable tourism can combine recreation for people, economic opportunities for entrepreneurs, and environmental protection, but for mountain tourism, climate change and the predicted reductions in snowfall require urgent action. Therefore, this study aims to identify sustainable mountain tourism strategies and consumption patterns using a multi‐criteria decision methodology and data collected through an online survey and expert opinions. The results show the importance of stakeholder engagement and the relevance of three strategies: (i) zero‐emission lodges; (ii) energy communities, and (iii) zero‐emission ski lifts. As well as pointing out the need for sustainability awareness and education. While respondents pay a great deal of attention to sustainability, the analysis highlights three policy interventions to safeguard mountain tourism: (i) financing the conversion of facilities; (ii) expanding infrastructure to reach mountain resorts, and (iii) rewarding consumers for choosing a certified zero‐emission resort.

Suggested Citation

  • Annarita Colasante & Idiano D'Adamo & Alfredo De Massis & Simone Italiano, 2024. "An exploratory study of stakeholder views on the sustainable development of mountain tourism," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3722-3735, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:3722-3735
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:4:p:3722-3735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.