IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v32y2024i3p1894-1912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable development according to 2030 agenda in European Union countries: Evidence of the enlargement policy

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Ricciolini
  • Arianna Tiralti
  • Luisa Paolotti
  • Lucia Rocchi
  • Antonio Boggia

Abstract

This paper assesses the performance of European Union countries in achieving sustainable development using an assessment framework based on the 2030 Agenda. Through the application of the Spatial Sustainability Assessment Model, which integrates multi‐criteria analysis with the geographical tool QuantumGIS, European countries are classified according to the four basic dimensions of sustainability (social, economic, environmental, and institutional) organized into various sub‐dimensions, with reference to the year 2020. The results show that Northern countries have better overall sustainability performance in all dimensions except the environment. In contrast, Eastern European and Mediterranean countries perform worse, showing major weaknesses, especially in the economic and institutional dimensions, with a gap between the countries that joined the Union after 2004 and the other states. An in‐depth analysis was conducted to highlight the reasons behind these difficulties in order to give useful indications to public decision‐makers, as a tool for planning, on future choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Ricciolini & Arianna Tiralti & Luisa Paolotti & Lucia Rocchi & Antonio Boggia, 2024. "Sustainable development according to 2030 agenda in European Union countries: Evidence of the enlargement policy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 1894-1912, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:3:p:1894-1912
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2758
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2758?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:32:y:2024:i:3:p:1894-1912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.