IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v26y2018i6p620-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Useful information for stakeholder engagement: A multivariate proposal of an Industrial Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index

Author

Listed:
  • Víctor Amor‐Esteban
  • Mª‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón
  • Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to create an industrial corporate social responsibility practices index (ICSRPI) that allows us to determine the level of sustainable business commitment in the main industries. The ICSRPI allows simplification and quantification of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices; identification of those industries which present greater deficiencies in sustainability systems to facilitate the planning of various improvement actions; and provision of pertinent information on environmental and social issues to guide stakeholders in their decision‐making processes. In this sense, empirically, the ICSRPI reveals that companies from more polluting sectors, such as oil and gas, chemical, paper or mining, are perceived as having high environmental risk and are the leaders in sustainable development. Companies from less polluting sectors, such as the media or financial services, have lower CSR scores; however, they present high values in social issues, giving higher priority to business ethics and the rights of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Mª‐Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2018. "Useful information for stakeholder engagement: A multivariate proposal of an Industrial Corporate Social Responsibility Practices Index," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 620-637, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:26:y:2018:i:6:p:620-637
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.1732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.1732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:26:y:2018:i:6:p:620-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.