IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v26y2018i6p564-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Integrated Sustainable Assessment Methodology for Existing Neighborhoods (UISA fEN), a New Approach for Promoting Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyn Erandi Reyes Nieto
  • Constança Rigueiro
  • Luís Simões da Silva
  • Vitor Murtinho

Abstract

The urban sustainable assessment tools (USATs) are often used to measure the effectiveness of communities in achieving sustainable development goals. However, there is still a lack of in‐depth critical evaluation of these tools. This paper analyzes the current USATs, having as a result of this study an outline of the main shortcomings of these methodologies. The presentation of a solution to these limitations is the aim of the paper, and it is satisfied with the introduction of a new comprehensive methodology, named ‘UISA fEN’ (Urban Integrated Sustainable Assessment methodology for Existing Neighborhoods), which is an indexing model for evaluating sustainability in existing neighborhoods. This paper outlines a general overview of UISA fEN methodology with the objective of providing a series of reflections on how to enhance the sustainability of existing neighborhoods, by using the proper sustainable key indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyn Erandi Reyes Nieto & Constança Rigueiro & Luís Simões da Silva & Vitor Murtinho, 2018. "Urban Integrated Sustainable Assessment Methodology for Existing Neighborhoods (UISA fEN), a New Approach for Promoting Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 564-587, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:26:y:2018:i:6:p:564-587
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.1720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1720
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.1720?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernest Haou & Ndonaye Allarané & Cyprien Coffi Aholou & Ouya Bondoro, 2024. "Stakeholder-Based Optimal Indicators for Urban Sustainability Assessment in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study from the City of Moundou in Chad," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-37, September.
    2. Jutta Deffner & Jan-Marc Joost & Manuela Weber & Immanuel Stiess, 2021. "Bottom-Up Strategies for Shared Mobility and Practices in Urban Housing to Improve Sustainable Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Li Zhu & Chen Wang & Ning Huang & Yu Fu & Zhexing Yan, 2022. "Developing an Indicator System to Monitor City’s Sustainability Integrated Local Governance: A Case Study in Zhangjiakou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Rongrong Liu & Dong Chen & Suchang Yang & Yang Chen, 2021. "Evaluation of Green Development Efficiency of the Major Cities in Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Vassiliki DELITHEOU & Stavroula GEORGAKOPOULOU, 2019. "Integrated Territorial Investments As A Tool For Sustainable Urban Development. The Case Of Piraeus Municipality," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 22-40, August.
    6. Li, Ye & Chen, Yiyan & Li, Qun, 2020. "Assessment analysis of green development level based on S-type cloud model of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:26:y:2018:i:6:p:564-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.