IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v24y2016i3p154-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religion and Sustainable Urban Planning: ‘If you can't count it, or won't count it, it doesn't count’

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Narayanan
  • Clara Greed

Abstract

Sustainability objectives are central to modern urban planning. Originally, sustainability had three components, environmental sustainability, economic well‐being and social equality: planet, prosperity and people. However, the environmental aspects of sustainability have tended to predominate. This leaves little space for social issues and aspatial (non‐physical) factors such as belief and religion. It is argued, with reference to UK‐related research, that religion has major spatial planning implications for all aspects and levels of urban policy. Neglecting religion's existence results in an incomplete planning agenda, undermining equality and diversity objectives. The implications of this gap are discussed with reference to the environmental, economic and social components of sustainability policy. There is little recognition of the contribution of religion to cities: rather, a negative mentality predominates amongst planners. Ways of changing the planners’ understanding and mainstreaming religion into planning are discussed, drawing on methods used to integrate gender into planning. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Narayanan & Clara Greed, 2016. "Religion and Sustainable Urban Planning: ‘If you can't count it, or won't count it, it doesn't count’," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 154-162, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:24:y:2016:i:3:p:154-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:24:y:2016:i:3:p:154-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.