IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v91y2025i3p850-880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie Bologna Pavlik
  • Justin T. Callais

Abstract

We examine the relationship between corruption and income inequality across countries. While previous studies have explored this association at both an international and within‐country level, we expand on this literature in two distinct ways. First, along with the most commonly utilized measure of inequality (Gini coefficients), we also examine income per‐capita at each decile, along with top 1% and 5%, and the associated income shares. Second, we employ an empirical strategy that differs from the existing literature. Our primary results are estimated using matching methods, but we also supplement these results with a “doubly robust” difference‐in‐difference design. We find that a reduction in corruption increases incomes of the top 80% but does not significantly impact incomes of the bottom 20%, or the top 1% and 5%. We find some evidence of income growth amongst the top 1% and 5% following increases in corruption, but these results are inconsistent across estimations. Our results also suggest that accounting for the size of the informal sector matters a great deal in understanding the relationship between corruption and the distribution of income.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie Bologna Pavlik & Justin T. Callais, 2025. "Good for the goose, bad for the gander? Corruption and income inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 91(3), pages 850-880, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:91:y:2025:i:3:p:850-880
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12733
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:91:y:2025:i:3:p:850-880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.