IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v76y2010i4p993-1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Investigation of Trust and Sequential Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Cary A. Deck

Abstract

The trust game has been widely studied in the laboratory and is often presented as a model of exchange with incomplete contracting. The standard presentation of the game differs in three potentially important ways from the naturally occurring transactions it represents: buyer‐seller framing, payoff privacy, and price setting. Two sets of experiments look at the combined effect of these three features while varying the order of moves, an aspect of the problem that previous research has found significantly affects the likelihood of a successful trade. In both cases high levels of trust and low levels of trustworthiness are observed. Further experimental investigation suggests that the framing effect generates the increased trust but that payoff privacy reduces trustworthiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Cary A. Deck, 2010. "An Experimental Investigation of Trust and Sequential Trade," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 76(4), pages 993-1004, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2010:i:4:p:993-1004
    DOI: 10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4284/sej.2010.76.4.993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2010:i:4:p:993-1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.