IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v76y2010i3p811-826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Managed Exchange Rates: The Case of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Tai-kuang Ho
  • Kuo-chun Yeh

Abstract

We use sign restrictions to identify monetary policy for a small open economy with heavily managed exchange rates. We apply the proposed sign restrictions to the Taiwanese case, where existing studies tend to find no clear effect of monetary policy shocks on the output and price level. Our principal findings are that a contractionary monetary policy shock causes a permanent and significant decline in real gross domestic product, broad money, and price level. Our identification scheme is able to avoid the puzzling impulse responses from which other identification schemes more or less suffer. The fact that monetary policy has not been correctly identified may have led existing studies to conclude that monetary policy is ineffective.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai-kuang Ho & Kuo-chun Yeh, 2010. "Measuring Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Managed Exchange Rates: The Case of Taiwan," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 76(3), pages 811-826, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2010:i:3:p:811-826
    DOI: 10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bünyamin Fuat Yıldız & Korhan K. Gökmenoğlu & Wing-Keung Wong, 2022. "Analysing Monetary Policy Shocks by Sign and Parametric Restrictions: The Evidence from Russia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2010:i:3:p:811-826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.