IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v8y1988i2p271-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does a Reactor Need a Safety Backfit? Case Study on Communicating Decision and Risk Analysis Information to Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Rex V. Brown
  • Jacob W. Ulvila

Abstract

An approach to communicating decision and risk analysis findings to managers is illustrated in a real case context. This article consists essentially of a report prepared for senior managers of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to help them make a reactor safety decision. It illustrates the communication of decision analysis findings relating to technical risks, costs, and benefits in support of a major risk management decision: whether or not to require a safety backfit. Its focus is on the needs of decision makers, and it introduces some novel communication devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Rex V. Brown & Jacob W. Ulvila, 1988. "Does a Reactor Need a Safety Backfit? Case Study on Communicating Decision and Risk Analysis Information to Managers," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 271-282, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:271-282
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01180.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01180.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01180.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:271-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.