IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v8y1988i2p247-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation Versus Confrontation: A Comparison of Approaches to Environmental Risk Management in Japan and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent T. Covello
  • Kazuhiko Kawamura
  • Mark Boroush
  • Saburo Ikeda
  • Paul F. Lynes
  • Michael S. Minor

Abstract

This paper compares approaches to environmental risk management in Japan and the United States. The paper includes an historical examination of two case studies of environmental risk management: synthetic detergents and lead in gasoline. In addition, the paper discusses several important differences between Japan and the United States, including (a) different attitudes toward separating environmental risk management from environmental risk assessment, and (b) different approaches toward environmental risk management. Specifically, the Japanese approach is based largely on a cooperative model of risk management, with a strong emphasis on negotiation and consensus‐building, while the U.S. approach is based largely on a confrontational model of risk management, with a strong emphasis on rigorous scientific analysis and open adverserial processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent T. Covello & Kazuhiko Kawamura & Mark Boroush & Saburo Ikeda & Paul F. Lynes & Michael S. Minor, 1988. "Cooperation Versus Confrontation: A Comparison of Approaches to Environmental Risk Management in Japan and the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 247-260, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:247-260
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01178.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01178.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01178.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saburo Ikeda, 1986. "Managing Technological and Environmental Risks in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 389-401, December.
    2. William D. Ruckelshaus, 1984. "Risk in a Free Society," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(3), pages 157-162, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 1998. "Environmental and economic consequences of technology adoption: IPM in viticulture," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 145-155, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saburo Ikeda & Iwao Uchiyama, 2006. "Scientific Peer‐Review Processes in Setting Environmental Quality Standards in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 21-23, February.
    2. Daniel J. Rozell, 2018. "The Ethical Foundations of Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(8), pages 1529-1533, August.
    3. Ralph L. Keeney & Detlof von Winterfeldt, 1991. "A Prescriptive Risk Framework for Individual Health and Safety Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 523-533, September.
    4. Paul Slovic, 1993. "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(6), pages 675-682, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:247-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.