IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v6y1986i1p43-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Detection Rates of Fires in Nuclear Plants: Development and Application of a Methodology for Treating Imprecise Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Siu
  • George Apostolakis

Abstract

A model is developed for the detection time of fires in nuclear power plants, which differentiates between competing modes of detection and between different initial fire severities. Our state‐of‐knowledge uncertainties in the values of the model parameters are assessed from industry experience using Bayesian methods. Because the available data are sparse, we propose means to interpret imprecise forms of evidence to the develop quantitative information, which can be used in a statistical analysis; the intent is to maximize our use of all available information. Sensitivity analyses are performed to indicate the importance of structural and distributional assumptions made in the study. The methods used to treat imprecise evidence can be applied to a wide variety of problems. The specific equations developed in this analysis are useful in general situations, where the random quantity of interest is the minimum of a set of random variables (e.g., in “competing risks” models). The computational results indicate that the competing modes formulation can lead to distributions different from those obtained via analytically simpler models, which treat each mode independently of the others.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Siu & George Apostolakis, 1986. "Modeling the Detection Rates of Fires in Nuclear Plants: Development and Application of a Methodology for Treating Imprecise Evidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 43-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:6:y:1986:i:1:p:43-59
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00193.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00193.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00193.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Greenberg & Charles Haas & Anthony Cox & Karen Lowrie & Katherine McComas & Warner North, 2012. "Ten Most Important Accomplishments in Risk Analysis, 1980–2010," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 771-781, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:6:y:1986:i:1:p:43-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.