IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v5y1985i1p9-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Design of Bioassays for Screening and Low Dose Extrapolation

Author

Listed:
  • David W. Gaylor
  • James J. Chen
  • Ralph L. Kodell

Abstract

Relatively high doses of chemicals generally are employed in animal bioassays to detect potential carcinogens with relatively small numbers of animals. The problem investigated here is the development of experimental designs which are effective for high to low dose extrapolation for tumor incidence as well as for screening (detecting) carcinogens. Several experimental designs are compared over a wide range of different dose response curves. Linear extrapolation is used below the experimental data range to establish an upper bound on carcinogenic risk at low doses. The goal is to find experimental designs which minimize the upper bound on low dose risk estimates (i.e., maximize the allowable dose for a given level of risk). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is employed for screening purposes. Among the designs investigated, experiments with doses at the MTD, 1/2 MTD, 1/4 MTD, and controls generally provide relatively good data for low dose extrapolation with relatively good power for detecting carcinogens. For this design, equal numbers of animals per dose level perform as well as unequal allocations.

Suggested Citation

  • David W. Gaylor & James J. Chen & Ralph L. Kodell, 1985. "Experimental Design of Bioassays for Screening and Low Dose Extrapolation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 9-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:5:y:1985:i:1:p:9-16
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00147.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00147.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00147.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert J. Kavlock & Judith E. Schmid & R. Woodrow Setzer, 1996. "A Simulation Study of the Influence of Study Design on the Estimation of Benchmark Doses for Developmental Toxicity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 399-410, June.
    2. Edie A. Weller & Paul J. Catalano & Paige L. Williams, 1995. "Implications of Developmental Toxicity Study Design for Quantitative Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 567-574, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:5:y:1985:i:1:p:9-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.