IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v38y2018i1p151-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Likelihood and Magnitude of a Population Health Benefit Following the Market Introduction of a Modified‐Risk Tobacco Product: Enhancements to the Dynamic Population Modeler, DPM(+1)

Author

Listed:
  • Annette M. Bachand
  • Sandra I. Sulsky
  • Geoffrey M. Curtin

Abstract

Researchers and those responsible for evaluating and implementing policies intended to reduce population harm must assess the potential for both intended and unintended consequences associated with those policies. Such assessments should be based on the combined dimensions of magnitude, and thus likelihood, of shifts in exposure patterns needed to produce a population benefit or harm, and magnitude of the expected population benefit or harm. In response to this assessment need, we provide a conceptual description of the dynamic population modeler, DPM(+1), as well as illustrative analyses that estimate the effects on all‐cause mortality, life expectancy, and quality of life‐adjusted life expectancy if exposure patterns in the population shift from a higher risk product (e.g., cigarettes) to a lower, or modified, risk tobacco product (MRTP) in specified ways. Estimates from these analyses indicate that, within a single birth cohort, switching completely from cigarette smoking to MRTP use is more likely to lead to a population‐level survival benefit than initiating tobacco use with an MRTP instead of cigarettes. This is because tobacco initiation rarely occurs beyond young adulthood, whereas continuing smokers exist in all subsequent age categories, leading to a greater cumulative effect. In addition, complete switching to MRTP use among a small proportion of smokers in each age category offsets the survival deficit caused by unintended shifts in exposure patterns, such as MRTP initiation among never tobacco users followed by transitioning to cigarette smoking and/or cigarette smokers switching to MRTP use instead of quitting.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette M. Bachand & Sandra I. Sulsky & Geoffrey M. Curtin, 2018. "Assessing the Likelihood and Magnitude of a Population Health Benefit Following the Market Introduction of a Modified‐Risk Tobacco Product: Enhancements to the Dynamic Population Modeler, DPM(+1)," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 151-162, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:151-162
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raheema S. Muhammad-Kah & Yezdi B. Pithawalla & Edward L. Boone & Lai Wei & Michael A. Jones & Ryan A. Black & Thomas M. Bryan & Mohamadi A. Sarkar, 2019. "A Computational Model for Assessing the Population Health Impact of Introducing a Modified Risk Claim on an Existing Smokeless Tobacco Product," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. David T. Levy & Christopher J. Cadham & Yameng Li & Zhe Yuan & Alex C. Liber & Hayoung Oh & Nargiz Travis & Mona Issabakhsh & David T. Sweanor & Luz Maria Sánchez-Romero & Rafael Meza & K. Michael Cum, 2022. "A Decision-Theoretic Public Health Framework for Heated Tobacco and Nicotine Vaping Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:151-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.