Author
Listed:
- Jennifer L. Kriss
- Aurora Stanescu
- Adriana Pistol
- Cassandra Butu
- James L. Goodson
Abstract
Despite global improvement in annual measles incidence and mortality since 2000, progress toward elimination goals has slowed. The World Health Organization (WHO) European Region (EUR) established a regional goal for measles and rubella elimination by 2015. Romania is one of 13 EUR countries in which measles remains endemic. To identify barriers to meeting programmatic targets and to aid in prioritizing efforts to strengthen measles elimination strategy implementation, the WHO and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed a measles programmatic risk assessment tool that uses routinely collected data to estimate district‐level risk scores. The WHO measles programmatic risk assessment tool was used to identify high‐risk areas in order to guide measles elimination program activities in Romania. Of the 42 districts in Romania, 27 (64%) were categorized as very high or high risk. Many of the very‐high‐risk districts were clustered in the western part of the country or were clustered around the capital Bucharest in the southeastern part of the country. The overall risk scores in the very‐high‐risk districts were driven primarily by poor surveillance quality and suboptimal population immunity. The measles risk assessment conducted in Romania was the first assessment to be completed in a European country. Annual assessments using the programmatic risk tool could provide valuable information for immunization program and surveillance staff at the national level and in each district to guide activities to enhance measles elimination efforts, such as strengthening routine immunization services, improving immunization campaign planning, and intensifying surveillance.
Suggested Citation
Jennifer L. Kriss & Aurora Stanescu & Adriana Pistol & Cassandra Butu & James L. Goodson, 2017.
"The World Health Organization Measles Programmatic Risk Assessment Tool—Romania, 2015,"
Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1096-1107, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1096-1107
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12669
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1096-1107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.