IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v37y2017i6p1082-1095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the World Health Organization Measles Programmatic Risk Assessment Tool for Monitoring of Supplemental Immunization Activities in the Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Joyce U. Ducusin
  • Maricel de Quiroz‐Castro
  • Sigrun Roesel
  • Luzviminda C. Garcia
  • Dulce Cecilio‐Elfa
  • W. William Schluter
  • James L. Goodson
  • Eugene Lam

Abstract

In 2012, the World Health Organization Regional Committee for the Western Pacific Region (WPR) reaffirmed its commitment to eliminate measles and urged WPR member states to interrupt endemic measles virus transmission as rapidly as possible. In 2013, a large measles outbreak occurred in the Philippines despite implementation of measles elimination strategies including a nationwide supplemental immunization activity (SIA) in 2011 using measles‐ and rubella‐containing vaccine and targeting children aged nine months to seven years. To prevent future measles outbreaks a new tool was developed to assess district‐level risk for measles outbreaks, based on the WPR polio risk assessment tool previously applied in the Philippines. Risk was assessed as a function of combined indicator scores from four data input categories: population immunity, surveillance quality, program performance, and threat assessment. On the basis of the overall score, the tool assigned each district a risk category of low, medium, high, or very high. Of the 122 districts and highly urbanized cities in the Philippines, 58 (48%) were classified as high risk or very high risk, including the district of the Metro Manila area and Region 4A where the outbreak began in 2013. Risk assessment results were used to guide the monitoring and supervision during the nationwide SIA conducted in 2014. The initial tool drafted in the Philippines served as a template for development of the global risk assessment tool. Regular annual measles programmatic risk assessments can be used to help plan risk mitigation activities and measure progress toward measles elimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Joyce U. Ducusin & Maricel de Quiroz‐Castro & Sigrun Roesel & Luzviminda C. Garcia & Dulce Cecilio‐Elfa & W. William Schluter & James L. Goodson & Eugene Lam, 2017. "Using the World Health Organization Measles Programmatic Risk Assessment Tool for Monitoring of Supplemental Immunization Activities in the Philippines," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1082-1095, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1082-1095
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:6:p:1082-1095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.