IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v36y2016i8p1520-1537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Risk Analysis for Nanoscale Materials: Report from an International Workshop on the Role of Alternative Testing Strategies for Advancement

Author

Listed:
  • J. A. Shatkin
  • Kimberly J. Ong
  • Christian Beaudrie
  • Amy J. Clippinger
  • Christine Ogilvie Hendren
  • Lynne T. Haber
  • Myriam Hill
  • Patricia Holden
  • Alan J. Kennedy
  • Baram Kim
  • Margaret MacDonell
  • Christina M. Powers
  • Monita Sharma
  • Lorraine Sheremeta
  • Vicki Stone
  • Yasir Sultan
  • Audrey Turley
  • Ronald H. White

Abstract

The Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) has a history of bringing thought leadership to topics of emerging risk. In September 2014, the SRA Emerging Nanoscale Materials Specialty Group convened an international workshop to examine the use of alternative testing strategies (ATS) for manufactured nanomaterials (NM) from a risk analysis perspective. Experts in NM environmental health and safety, human health, ecotoxicology, regulatory compliance, risk analysis, and ATS evaluated and discussed the state of the science for in vitro and other alternatives to traditional toxicology testing for NM. Based on this review, experts recommended immediate and near‐term actions that would advance ATS use in NM risk assessment. Three focal areas—human health, ecological health, and exposure considerations—shaped deliberations about information needs, priorities, and the next steps required to increase confidence in and use of ATS in NM risk assessment. The deliberations revealed that ATS are now being used for screening, and that, in the near term, ATS could be developed for use in read‐across or categorization decision making within certain regulatory frameworks. Participants recognized that leadership is required from within the scientific community to address basic challenges, including standardizing materials, protocols, techniques and reporting, and designing experiments relevant to real‐world conditions, as well as coordination and sharing of large‐scale collaborations and data. Experts agreed that it will be critical to include experimental parameters that can support the development of adverse outcome pathways. Numerous other insightful ideas for investment in ATS emerged throughout the discussions and are further highlighted in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • J. A. Shatkin & Kimberly J. Ong & Christian Beaudrie & Amy J. Clippinger & Christine Ogilvie Hendren & Lynne T. Haber & Myriam Hill & Patricia Holden & Alan J. Kennedy & Baram Kim & Margaret MacDonell, 2016. "Advancing Risk Analysis for Nanoscale Materials: Report from an International Workshop on the Role of Alternative Testing Strategies for Advancement," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1520-1537, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:8:p:1520-1537
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12683
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12683?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jo Anne Shatkin & Linda Carolyn Abbott & Ann E. Bradley & Richard Alan Canady & Tee Guidotti & Kristen M. Kulinowski & Ragnar E. Löfstedt & Garrick Louis & Margaret MacDonell & Andrew D. Maynard & Gre, 2010. "Nano Risk Analysis: Advancing the Science for Nanomaterials Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(11), pages 1680-1687, November.
    2. Vicki Stone & Helinor J. Johnston & Dominique Balharry & Jeremy M. Gernand & Mary Gulumian, 2016. "Approaches to Develop Alternative Testing Strategies to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1538-1550, August.
    3. J. A. Shatkin & K. J. Ong, 2016. "Alternative Testing Strategies for Nanomaterials: State of the Science and Considerations for Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1564-1580, August.
    4. Monita Sharma & Jo Anne Shatkin & Carolyn Cairns & Richard Canady & Amy J. Clippinger, 2016. "Framework to Evaluate Exposure Relevance and Data Needs for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials using in Vitro Testing Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1551-1563, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vicki Stone & Martin Führ & Peter H. Feindt & Hans Bouwmeester & Igor Linkov & Stefania Sabella & Finbarr Murphy & Kilian Bizer & Lang Tran & Marlene Ågerstrand & Carlos Fito & Torben Andersen & Diana, 2018. "The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1321-1331, July.
    2. Vicki Stone & Helinor J. Johnston & Dominique Balharry & Jeremy M. Gernand & Mary Gulumian, 2016. "Approaches to Develop Alternative Testing Strategies to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(8), pages 1538-1550, August.
    3. Igor Linkov & Benjamin D. Trump & Elke Anklam & David Berube & Patrick Boisseasu & Christopher Cummings & Scott Ferson & Marie-Valentine Florin & Bernard Goldstein & Danail Hristozov & Keld Alstrup Je, 2018. "Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 170-176, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Greenberg & Anthony Cox & Vicki Bier & Jim Lambert & Karen Lowrie & Warner North & Michael Siegrist & Felicia Wu, 2020. "Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2113-2127, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:8:p:1520-1537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.