IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v36y2016i7p1297-1314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Review of Health Economic Analyses of Measles and Rubella Immunization Interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly M. Thompson
  • Cassie L. Odahowski

Abstract

Economic analyses for vaccine‐preventable diseases provide important insights about the value of prevention. We reviewed the literature to identify all of the peer‐reviewed, published economic analyses of interventions related to measles and rubella immunization options to assess the different types of analyses performed and characterize key insights. We searched PubMed, the Science Citation Index, and references from relevant articles for studies in English and found 67 analyses that reported primary data and quantitative estimates of benefit‐cost or cost‐effectiveness analyses for measles and/or rubella immunization interventions. We removed studies that we characterized as cost‐minimization analyses from this sample because they generally provide insights that focused on more optimal strategies to achieve the same health outcome. The 67 analyses we included demonstrate the large economic benefits associated with preventing measles and rubella infections using vaccines and the benefit of combining measles and rubella antigens into a formulation that saves the costs associated with injecting the vaccines separately. Despite the importance of population immunity and dynamic viral transmission, most of the analyses used static models to estimate cases prevented and characterize benefits, although the use of dynamic models continues to increase. Many of the analyses focused on characterizing the most significant adverse outcomes (e.g., mortality for measles, congenital rubella syndrome for rubella) and/or only direct costs, and the most complete analyses present data from high‐income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly M. Thompson & Cassie L. Odahowski, 2016. "Systematic Review of Health Economic Analyses of Measles and Rubella Immunization Interventions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1297-1314, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:7:p:1297-1314
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12331
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12331?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. White, C.C. & Koplan, J.P. & Orenstein, W.A., 1985. "Benefits, risks and costs of immunization for measles, mumps and rubella," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 75(7), pages 739-744.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kimberly M. Thompson & Cassie L. Odahowski, 2016. "The Costs and Valuation of Health Impacts of Measles and Rubella Risk Management Policies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(7), pages 1357-1382, July.
    2. Philipson, Tomas, 1995. "The welfare loss of disease and the theory of taxation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 387-395, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:36:y:2016:i:7:p:1297-1314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.