IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v35y2015i10p1940-1956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment of the Carbon Nanotube Group

Author

Listed:
  • Junko Nakanishi
  • Yasuo Morimoto
  • Isamu Ogura
  • Norihiro Kobayashi
  • Masato Naya
  • Makoto Ema
  • Shigehisa Endoh
  • Manabu Shimada
  • Akira Ogami
  • Toshihiko Myojyo
  • Takako Oyabu
  • Masashi Gamo
  • Atsuo Kishimoto
  • Takuya Igarashi
  • Sosuke Hanai

Abstract

This study assessed the health risks via inhalation and derived the occupational exposure limit (OEL) for the carbon nanotube (CNT) group rather than individual CNT material. We devised two methods: the integration of the intratracheal instillation (IT) data with the inhalation (IH) data, and the “biaxial approach.” A four‐week IH test and IT test were performed in rats exposed to representative materials to obtain the no observed adverse effect level, based on which the OEL was derived. We used the biaxial approach to conduct a relative toxicity assessment of six types of CNTs. An OEL of 0.03 mg/m3 was selected as the criterion for the CNT group. We proposed that the OEL be limited to 15 years. We adopted adaptive management, in which the values are reviewed whenever new data are obtained. The toxicity level was found to be correlated with the Brunauer‐Emmett‐Teller (BET)‐specific surface area (BET‐SSA) of CNT, suggesting the BET‐SSA to have potential for use in toxicity estimation. We used the published exposure data and measurement results of dustiness tests to compute the risk in relation to particle size at the workplace and showed that controlling micron‐sized respirable particles was of utmost importance. Our genotoxicity studies indicated that CNT did not directly interact with genetic materials. They supported the concept that, even if CNT is genotoxic, it is secondary genotoxicity mediated via a pathway of genotoxic damage resulting from oxidative DNA attack by free radicals generated during CNT‐elicited inflammation. Secondary genotoxicity appears to involve a threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Junko Nakanishi & Yasuo Morimoto & Isamu Ogura & Norihiro Kobayashi & Masato Naya & Makoto Ema & Shigehisa Endoh & Manabu Shimada & Akira Ogami & Toshihiko Myojyo & Takako Oyabu & Masashi Gamo & Atsuo, 2015. "Risk Assessment of the Carbon Nanotube Group," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(10), pages 1940-1956, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:10:p:1940-1956
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12394
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:10:p:1940-1956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.