IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v34y2014i5p911-928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dose‐Response Models Incorporating Aerosol Size Dependency for Francisella tularensis

Author

Listed:
  • Sondra S. Teske
  • Mark H. Weir
  • Timothy A. Bartrand
  • Yin Huang
  • Sushil B. Tamrakar
  • Charles N. Haas

Abstract

The effect of bioaerosol size was incorporated into predictive dose‐response models for the effects of inhaled aerosols of Francisella tularensis (the causative agent of tularemia) on rhesus monkeys and guinea pigs with bioaerosol diameters ranging between 1.0 and 24 μm. Aerosol‐size‐dependent models were formulated as modification of the exponential and β‐Poisson dose‐response models and model parameters were estimated using maximum likelihood methods and multiple data sets of quantal dose‐response data for which aerosol sizes of inhaled doses were known. Analysis of F. tularensis dose‐response data was best fit by an exponential dose‐response model with a power function including the particle diameter size substituting for the rate parameter k scaling the applied dose. There were differences in the pathogen's aerosol‐size‐dependence equation and models that better represent the observed dose‐response results than the estimate derived from applying the model developed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP, 1994) that relies on differential regional lung deposition for human particle exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Sondra S. Teske & Mark H. Weir & Timothy A. Bartrand & Yin Huang & Sushil B. Tamrakar & Charles N. Haas, 2014. "Dose‐Response Models Incorporating Aerosol Size Dependency for Francisella tularensis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 911-928, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:5:p:911-928
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:5:p:911-928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.