IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v33y2013i5p755-756.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Letter in Response to Fraas & Lutter Article: “Uncertain Benefits Estimates for Reductions in Fine Particle Concentrations”

Author

Listed:
  • Neal Fann
  • Amy D. Lamson
  • Susan C. Anenberg
  • Bryan J. Hubbell

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal Fann & Amy D. Lamson & Susan C. Anenberg & Bryan J. Hubbell, 2013. "Letter in Response to Fraas & Lutter Article: “Uncertain Benefits Estimates for Reductions in Fine Particle Concentrations”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(5), pages 755-756, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:755-756
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12000
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Art Fraas & Randall Lutter, 2013. "Uncertain Benefits Estimates for Reductions in Fine Particle Concentrations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 434-449, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne E. Smith, 2018. "Setting Air Quality Standards for PM2.5: A Role for Subjective Uncertainty in NAAQS Quantitative Risk Assessments?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2318-2339, November.
    2. Anne E. Smith & Will Gans, 2015. "Enhancing the Characterization of Epistemic Uncertainties in PM2.5 Risk Analyses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 361-378, March.
    3. Anne E. Smith, 2020. "Using Uncertainty Analysis to Improve Consistency in Regulatory Assessments of Criteria Pollutant Standards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 442-449, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:33:y:2013:i:5:p:755-756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.