IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v30y2010i3p400-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of Posterior Probability Models in Risk‐Based Integrity Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Premkumar N. Thodi
  • Faisal I. Khan
  • Mahmoud R. Haddara

Abstract

There is a need for accurate modeling of mechanisms causing material degradation of equipment in process installation, to ensure safety and reliability of the equipment. Degradation mechanisms are stochastic processes. They can be best described using risk‐based approaches. Risk‐based integrity assessment quantifies the level of risk to which the individual components are subjected and provides means to mitigate them in a safe and cost‐effective manner. The uncertainty and variability in structural degradations can be best modeled by probability distributions. Prior probability models provide initial description of the degradation mechanisms. As more inspection data become available, these prior probability models can be revised to obtain posterior probability models, which represent the current system and can be used to predict future failures. In this article, a rejection sampling‐based Metropolis‐Hastings (M‐H) algorithm is used to develop posterior distributions. The M‐H algorithm is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm used to generate a sequence of posterior samples without actually knowing the normalizing constant. Ignoring the transient samples in the generated Markov chain, the steady state samples are rejected or accepted based on an acceptance criterion. To validate the estimated parameters of posterior models, analytical Laplace approximation method is used to compute the integrals involved in the posterior function. Results of the M‐H algorithm and Laplace approximations are compared with conjugate pair estimations of known prior and likelihood combinations. The M‐H algorithm provides better results and hence it is used for posterior development of the selected priors for corrosion and cracking.

Suggested Citation

  • Premkumar N. Thodi & Faisal I. Khan & Mahmoud R. Haddara, 2010. "The Development of Posterior Probability Models in Risk‐Based Integrity Modeling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 400-420, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:400-420
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01352.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01352.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01352.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Faisal I. Khan & Mahmoud M. Haddara & Subrata K. Bhattacharya, 2006. "Risk‐Based Integrity and Inspection Modeling (RBIIM) of Process Components/System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 203-221, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aalirezaei, Armin & Kabir, Dr. Golam & Khan, Md Saiful Arif, 2023. "Dynamic predictive analysis of the consequences of gas pipeline failures using a Bayesian network," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:30:y:2010:i:3:p:400-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.