IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v29y2009i1p48-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Spatial Approach to Environmental Risk Assessment of PAH Contamination

Author

Listed:
  • Göran Bengtsson
  • Niklas Törneman

Abstract

The extent of remediation of contaminated industrial sites depends on spatial heterogeneity of contaminant concentration and spatially explicit risk characterization. We used sequential Gaussian simulation (SGS) and indicator kriging (IK) to describe the spatial distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pH, electric conductivity, particle aggregate distribution, water holding capacity, and total organic carbon, and quantitative relations among them, in a creosote polluted soil in southern Sweden. The geostatistical analyses were combined with risk analyses, in which the total toxic equivalent concentration of the PAH mixture was calculated from the soil concentrations of individual PAHs and compared with ecotoxicological effect concentrations and regulatory threshold values in block sizes of 1.8 × 1.8 m. Most PAHs were spatially autocorrelated and appeared in several hot spots. The risk calculated by SGS was more confined to specific hot spot areas than the risk calculated by IK, and 40–50% of the site had PAH concentrations exceeding the threshold values with a probability of 80% and higher. The toxic equivalent concentration of the PAH mixture was dependent on the spatial distribution of organic carbon, showing the importance of assessing risk by a combination of measurements of PAH and organic carbon concentrations. Essentially, the same risk distribution pattern was maintained when Monte Carlo simulations were used for implementation of risk in larger (5 × 5 m), economically more feasible remediation blocks, but a smaller area became of great concern for remediation when the simulations included PAH partitioning to two separate sources, creosote and natural, of organic matter, rather than one general.

Suggested Citation

  • Göran Bengtsson & Niklas Törneman, 2009. "A Spatial Approach to Environmental Risk Assessment of PAH Contamination," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 48-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:1:p:48-61
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01128.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01128.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01128.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith R. Solomon, 1996. "Overview of Recent Developments in Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(5), pages 627-633, October.
    2. William C. Thayer & Daniel A. Griffith & Philip E. Goodrum & Gary L. Diamond & James M. Hassett, 2003. "Application of Geostatistics to Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5), pages 945-960, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentina Ferretti & Gilberto Montibeller, 2019. "An Integrated Framework for Environmental Multi‐Impact Spatial Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 257-273, January.
    2. Despoina Ioannidou & Laure Malherbe & Maxime Beauchamp & Nicolas P.A. Saby & Roseline Bonnard & Julien Caudeville, 2018. "Characterization of Environmental Health Inequalities Due to Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crossan, Agnus N. & Trang, Nguyen Thi Thu & Ha, Pham Ngoc & Kennedy, Ivan R. (ed.), 2005. "Safer selection and use of pesticides: Integrating risk assessment, monitoring and management of pesticides," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 114091.
    2. Lauren Bugdalski & Lawrence D. Lemke & Shawn P. McElmurry, 2014. "Spatial Variation of Soil Lead in an Urban Community Garden: Implications for Risk‐Based Sampling," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 17-27, January.
    3. Peter Nijkamp & Chiara Maria Travisi & Gabriella Vindigni, 2002. "Pesticide Risk Valuation in Empirical Economics," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-112/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Glenn W. Suter, 1998. "Comments on the Interpretation of Distributions in “Overview of Recent Developments in Ecological Risk Assessment”," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 3-4, February.
    5. Richard R. Lester & Laura C. Green & Igor Linkov, 2007. "Site‐Specific Applications of Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment: Review of the Literature Since 2000," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 635-658, June.
    6. Martí Nadal & Vikas Kumar & Marta Schuhmacher & José L. Domingo, 2008. "Applicability of a Neuroprobabilistic Integral Risk Index for the Environmental Management of Polluted Areas: A Case Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 271-286, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:1:p:48-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.