Author
Listed:
- Roberta L. Grant
- Joseph Haney
- Angela L. Curry
- Michael Honeycutt
Abstract
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has developed an inhalation unit risk factor (URF) for 1,3‐butadiene based on leukemia mortality in an updated epidemiological study on styrene‐butadiene rubber production workers conducted by researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Exposure estimates were updated and an exposure estimate validation study as well as dose‐response modeling were conducted by these researchers. This information was not available to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency when it prepared its health assessment of 1,3‐butadiene in 2002. An extensive analysis conducted by TCEQ discusses dose‐response modeling, estimating risk for the general population from occupational workers, estimating risk for potentially sensitive subpopulations, effect of occupational exposure estimation error, and use of mortality rates to predict incidence. The URF is 5.0 × 10−7 per μg/m3 or 1.1 × 10−6 per ppb and is based on a Cox regression dose‐response model using restricted continuous data with age as a covariate, and a linear low‐dose extrapolation default approach using the 95% lower confidence limit as the point of departure. Age‐dependent adjustment factors were applied to account for possible increased susceptibility for early life exposure. The air concentration at 1 in 100,000 excess leukemia mortality, the no‐significant‐risk level, is 20 μg/m3 (9.1 ppb), which is slightly lower than the TCEQ chronic reference value of 33 μg/m3 (15 ppb) protective of ovarian atrophy. These values will be used to evaluate ambient air monitoring data so the general public is protected against adverse health effects from chronic exposure to 1,3‐butadiene.
Suggested Citation
Roberta L. Grant & Joseph Haney & Angela L. Curry & Michael Honeycutt, 2009.
"Development of a Unit Risk Factor for 1,3‐Butadiene Based on an Updated Carcinogenic Toxicity Assessment,"
Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(12), pages 1726-1742, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:12:p:1726-1742
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01302.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:12:p:1726-1742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.