IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v22y2002i3p513-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spokane Tribe's Multipathway Subsistence Exposure Scenario and Screening Level RME

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara L. Harper
  • Brian Flett
  • Stuart Harris
  • Corn Abeyta
  • Fred Kirschner

Abstract

Exposure scenarios are a critical part of risk assessment; however, representative scenarios are not generally available for tribal communities where a traditional subsistence lifestyle and diet are relevant and actively encouraged. This article presents portions of a multipathway exposure scenario developed by AESE, Inc. in conjunction with the Spokane Tribal Cultural Resources Program. The scenario serves as the basis for a screening‐level reasonable maximum exposure (RME) developed for the Midnite Uranium Mine Superfund site. The process used in developing this scenario balances the need to characterize exposures without revealing proprietary information. The scenario and resulting RME reflect the subsistence use of original and existing natural resources by a hypothetical but representative family living on the reservation at or near the mine site. The representative family lives in a house in a sparsely populated conifer forest, tends a home garden, partakes in a high rate of subsistence activities (hunting, gathering, fishing), uses a sweat lodge daily, has a regular schedule of other cultural activities, and has members employed in outdoor monitoring of natural and cultural resources. The scenario includes two largely subsistence diets based on fish or game, both of which include native plants and home‐grown produce. Data gaps and sources of uncertainty are identified. Additional information that risk assessors and agencies need to understand before doing any kind of risk assessment or public health assessment in tribal situations is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara L. Harper & Brian Flett & Stuart Harris & Corn Abeyta & Fred Kirschner, 2002. "The Spokane Tribe's Multipathway Subsistence Exposure Scenario and Screening Level RME," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 513-526, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:513-526
    DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00047
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0272-4332.00047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Arsenault & Carrie Bourassa & Sibyl Diver & Deborah McGregor & Aaron Witham, 2019. "Including Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Environmental Assessments: Restructuring the Process," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(3), pages 120-132, August.
    2. Marc Stifelman, 2003. "Letter to the Editor," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5), pages 859-860, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:513-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.