IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v21y2001i5p837-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Bayes Approach to Estimating the Relation of Mortality to Exposure to Particulate Matter

Author

Listed:
  • Ellen Post
  • David Hoaglin
  • Leland Deck
  • Kinley Larntz

Abstract

As part of its assessment of the health risks associated with exposure to particulate matter (PM), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency analyzed the risks associated with current levels, and the risk reductions that might be achieved by attainment of alternative PM standards, in two locations in the United States, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles. The concentration – response function describing the relation between a health endpoint and ambient PM concentrations is an important component, and a source of substantial uncertainty, in such risk analyses. In the absence of location‐specific estimates, the concentration –r esponse functions necessary for risk assessments in Philadelphia and Los Angeles must be inferred from the available information in other locations. Although the functional form of the concentration – response relations is assumed to be the same everywhere, the value of the PM coefficient in that function may vary from one location to another. Under this model, a distribution describes the probability that the PM coefficient in a randomly selected location will lie in any range of interest. An empirical Bayes estimation technique was used to improve the estimation of location‐specific concentration – response functions relating mortality to short‐term exposure to particles of aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm (PM‐2.5), for which functions have previously been estimated in several locations. The empirical Bayes‐adjusted parameter values and their SEs were used to derive an estimate of the distribution of PM‐2.5 coefficients for mortality associated with short‐term exposures. From this distribution, distributions of relative risks corresponding to different specified changes in PM‐2.5 concentrations could be derived.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen Post & David Hoaglin & Leland Deck & Kinley Larntz, 2001. "An Empirical Bayes Approach to Estimating the Relation of Mortality to Exposure to Particulate Matter," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5), pages 837-837, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:21:y:2001:i:5:p:837-837
    DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.215155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215155
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0272-4332.215155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ikuho Kochi & Bryan Hubbell & Randall Kramer, 2006. "An Empirical Bayes Approach to Combining and Comparing Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life for Environmental Policy Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(3), pages 385-406, July.
    2. Alain Le Tertre & Joel Schwartz & Giota Touloumi, 2005. "Empirical Bayes and Adjusted Estimates Approach to Estimating the Relation of Mortality to Exposure of PM10," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 711-718, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:21:y:2001:i:5:p:837-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.