IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v19y1999i6p1235-1249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk‐Based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency

Author

Listed:
  • Frank A. Swartjes

Abstract

To assess soil and groundwater quality two generic (i.e. multifunctional) risk‐based standards, Target and Intervention Value, have been developed, in the framework of the Dutch Soil Protection Act. These standards allow soil and groundwater to be classified as clean, slightly contaminated or seriously contaminated. The Target Value is basedon potential risks to ecosysystems, while the Intervention Value is based oqpotential risks to humans and ecosystems. In the case of serious soil contamination the site has, in principle, to be remediated, making it necessary to determine the remediation urgency on the basis of actual (i.e. site‐specific) risks to humans and ecosystems and, besides, actual risks due to contaminant migration.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank A. Swartjes, 1999. "Risk‐Based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 1235-1249, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:6:p:1235-1249
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01142.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01142.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01142.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Komnitsas, Kostas & Zaharaki, Dimitra, 2012. "Pre-treatment of olive mill wastewaters at laboratory and mill scale and subsequent use in agriculture: Legislative framework and proposed soil quality indicators," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-89.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:6:p:1235-1249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.