IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v19y1999i4p547-558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Uncertainty in an Oral Reference Dose for Methylmercury Due to Interindividual Variability in Pharmacokinetics

Author

Listed:
  • Harvey J. Clewell
  • Jeffery M. Gearhart
  • P. Robinan Gentry
  • Tammie R. Covington
  • Cynthia B. VanLandingham
  • Kenny S. Crump
  • Annette M. Shipp

Abstract

An analysis of the uncertainty in guidelines for the ingestion of methylmercury (MeHg) due to human pharmacokinetic variability was conducted using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that describes MeHg kinetics in the pregnant human and fetus. Two alternative derivations of an ingestion guideline for MeHg were considered: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference dose (RfD) of 0.1 pg/kg/day derived from studies of an Iraqi grain poisoning episode, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry chronic oral minimal risk level (MRL) of 0.5 pglkglday based on studies of a fisheating population in the Seychelles Islands. Calculation of an ingestion guideline for MeHg from either of these epidemiological studies requires calculation of a dose conversion factor (DCF) relating a hair mercury concentration to a chronic MeHg ingestion rate. To evaluate the uncertainty in this DCF across the population of U.S. women of child‐bearing age, Monte Carlo analyses were performed in which distributions for each of the parameters in the PBPK model were randomly sampled lo00 times. The 1st and 5th percentiles of the resulting distribution of DCFs were a factor of 1.8 and 1.5 below the median, respectively. This estimate of variability is consistent with, but somewhat less than, previous analyses performed with empirical, one‐compartment pharmacokinetic models. The use of a consistent factor in both guidelines of 1.5 for pharmacokinetic variability in the DCF, and keeping all other aspects of the derivations unchanged, would result in an RfD of 0.2 pglkglday and an MRL of 0.3 pglkglday.

Suggested Citation

  • Harvey J. Clewell & Jeffery M. Gearhart & P. Robinan Gentry & Tammie R. Covington & Cynthia B. VanLandingham & Kenny S. Crump & Annette M. Shipp, 1999. "Evaluation of the Uncertainty in an Oral Reference Dose for Methylmercury Due to Interindividual Variability in Pharmacokinetics," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 547-558, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:4:p:547-558
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00427.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00427.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00427.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bruce C. Allen & C. Eric Hack & Harvey J. Clewell, 2007. "Use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis with a Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Methylmercury to Estimate Exposures in U.S. Women of Childbearing Age," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 947-959, August.
    2. Leona H. Clark & R. Woodrow Setzer & Hugh A. Barton, 2004. "Framework for Evaluation of Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Use in Safety or Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1697-1717, December.
    3. Kai H. Liao & Yu‐Mei Tan & Harvey J. Clewell, 2007. "Development of a Screening Approach to Interpret Human Biomonitoring Data on Volatile Organic Compounds: Reverse Dosimetry on Biomonitoring Data for Trichloroethylene," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 1223-1236, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:19:y:1999:i:4:p:547-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.