IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v15y1995i2p205-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Human Interindividual Variability in Metabolism and Risk: The Example of 4‐Aminobiphenyl

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Yves Bois
  • Gail Krowech
  • Lauren Zeise

Abstract

We investigate, through modeling, the impact of interindividual heterogeneity in the metabolism of 4‐aminobiphenyl (ABP) and in physiological factors on human cancer risk: A physiological pharmacokinetic model was used to quantify the time course of the formation of the proximate carcinogen, N‐hydroxy‐4‐ABP and the DNA‐binding of the active species in the bladder. The metabolic and physiologic model parameters were randomly varied, via Monte Carlo simulations, to reproduce interindividual variability. The sampling means for most parameters were scaled from values developed by Kadlubar et al. (Cancer Res., 51: 4371, 1991) for dogs; variances were obtained primarily from published human data (e.g., measurements of ABP N‐oxidation, and arylamine N‐acetylation in human liver tissue). In 500 simulations, theoretically representing 500 humans, DNA‐adduct levels in the bladder of the most susceptible individuals are ten thousand times higher than for the least susceptible, and the 5th and 95th percentiles differ by a factor of 160. DNA binding for the most susceptible individual (with low urine pH, low N‐acetylation and high N‐oxidation activities) is theoretically one million‐fold higher than for the least susceptible (with high urine pH, high N‐acetylation and low N‐oxidation activities). The simulations also suggest that the four factors contributing most significantly to interindividual differences in DNA‐binding of ABP in human bladder are urine pH, ABP N‐oxidation, ABP N‐acetylation and urination frequency.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Yves Bois & Gail Krowech & Lauren Zeise, 1995. "Modeling Human Interindividual Variability in Metabolism and Risk: The Example of 4‐Aminobiphenyl," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 205-213, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:15:y:1995:i:2:p:205-213
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00314.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00314.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00314.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam M. Finkel, 2014. "EPA Underestimates, Oversimplifies, Miscommunicates, and Mismanages Cancer Risks by Ignoring Human Susceptibility," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(10), pages 1785-1794, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:15:y:1995:i:2:p:205-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.