IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v12y1992i1p129-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending the Stochastic Two‐Stage Model of Carcinogenesis to Include Self‐Regulation of the Nonmalignant Cell Population

Author

Listed:
  • Louis Anthony Cox

Abstract

One of the challenges of introducing greater biological realism into stochastic models of cancer induction is to find a way to represent the homeostatic control of the normal cell population over its own size without complicating the analysis too much to obtain useful results. Current two‐stage models of carcinogenesis typically ignore homeostatic control. Instead, a deterministic growth path is specified for the population of “normal” cells, while the population of “initiated” cells is assumed to grow randomly according to a birth‐death process with random immigrations from the normal population. This paper introduces a simple model of homeostatically controlled cell division for mature tissues, in which the size of the nonmalignant population remains essentially constant over time. Growth of the nonmalignant cell population (normal and initiated cells) is restricted by allowing cells to divide only to fill the “openings” left by cells that die or differentiate, thus maintaining the constant size of the nonmalignant cell population. The fundamental technical insight from this model is that random walks, rather than birth‐and‐death processes, are the appropriate stochastic processes for describing the kinetics of the initiated cell population. Qualitative and analytic results are presented, drawn from the mathematical theories of random walks and diffusion processes, that describe the probability of spontaneous extinction and the size distribution of surviving initiated populations when the death/differentiation rates of normal and initiated cells are known. The constraint that the nonmalignant population size must remain approximately constant leads to much simpler analytic formulas and approximations, flowing directly from random walk theory, than in previous birth‐death models. As in other stochastic models, our analysis implies that individual susceptibility to carcinogens affecting the second (malignant) transformation rate should follow an age‐dependent frequency distribution in a population of initially identical individuals; hence, individual risks are heterogeneous even in the absence of individual differences in exposure patterns or pharmacokinetics. A theoretical formula is developed for the approximate frequency distribution of individual susceptibilities in a population exposed to a simple initiator/ delay/completor regimen.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Anthony Cox, 1992. "Extending the Stochastic Two‐Stage Model of Carcinogenesis to Include Self‐Regulation of the Nonmalignant Cell Population," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 129-138, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:129-138
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01316.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01316.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01316.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zvi Schechner, 1982. "A note on randomly evolving hazard rate functions," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 693-695, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:129-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.