IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v40y2022i4p377-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The size effect and default risk: Evidence from the Vietnamese stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Le Quy Duong
  • Philippe Bertrand

Abstract

The literature is inconclusive on the source of the size effect. Our paper contributes to extant studies by investigating the relationship between the size premium and default risk in Vietnam, an important frontier emerging market. The debt‐to‐equity ratio and distance‐to‐default of Merton (1974, The Journal of Finance, 29, 449) are used as distress‐risk proxies. Based on more than 300 listed stocks over 2009–2019, we discover that the small portfolio delivers the highest average return. The excess return on the small portfolio is concentrated in firms with high distress risk. Furthermore, neutral size factors are built to dissect returns on the Fama‐French size factor from the default‐risk premium. Empirical results prove that the explanatory power of the size factor is negatively affected when the default‐risk neutrality is applied. Given this backdrop, the size premium in Vietnam is likely to be compensation for distress risk, consistent with a risk‐based point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Quy Duong & Philippe Bertrand, 2022. "The size effect and default risk: Evidence from the Vietnamese stock market," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 377-388, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:377-388
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1149
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.1149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:40:y:2022:i:4:p:377-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.