IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v3y2009i3p235-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adversarialism versus legalism: Juridification and litigation in corporate governance reform

Author

Listed:
  • John W. Cioffi

Abstract

Recent reforms of corporate governance law and related litigation rules in the US and in Germany indicate that reports of the spread of adversarial legalism are greatly exaggerated. Politics and legislation in the US since the mid‐1990s have turned quite decisively against shareholder litigation even as corporate governance and securities law reforms have expanded the role and scope of the regulatory state. Germany's extraordinary expansion of financial and corporate governance regulation since the early 1990s exemplifies juridification. Although these reforms included some liberalization of shareholder litigation rules, the changes reflected skepticism towards private litigation and imposed new constraints on the most prevalent forms of shareholder suits. Marketization of economic relations and the era of finance capitalism have produced far more legalism than adversarialism, more regulation than judicialization, and more ex ante transparency rules than ex post litigation remedies.

Suggested Citation

  • John W. Cioffi, 2009. "Adversarialism versus legalism: Juridification and litigation in corporate governance reform," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 235-258, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:235-258
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01054.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01054.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01054.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelemen, R. Daniel & Sibbitt, Eric C., 2005. "Lex Americana? A Response to Levi-Faur," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(2), pages 463-472, April.
    2. Robert A. Kagan, 1991. "Adversarial legalism and American government," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 369-406.
    3. Kelemen, R. Daniel & Sibbitt, Eric C., 2004. "The Globalization of American Law," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(1), pages 103-136, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trump, Benjamin D., 2017. "Synthetic biology regulation and governance: Lessons from TAPIC for the United States, European Union, and Singapore," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(11), pages 1139-1146.
    2. Grahame Thompson, 2007. "Tracking Global Corporate Citizenship: Some Reflections on ‘Lovesick' Companies," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp192, IIIS.
    3. Scott L. Greer & Benjamin Trump, 2019. "Regulation and regime: the comparative politics of adaptive regulation in synthetic biology," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 505-524, December.
    4. Lampach, Nicolas & Wijtvliet, Wessel & Dyevre, Arthur, 2020. "Merchant hubs and spatial disparities in the private enforcement of international trade regimes," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Aseem Prakash & Kelly Kollman, 2004. "Policy modes, firms and the natural environment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 107-128, March.
    6. Edward Alan Miller, 2006. "Federal Oversight, State Policy Making, and the Courts: An Empirical Analysis of Nursing Facility Litigation Under the Boren Amendment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), pages 145-173, March.
    7. Frans Van Waarden & Youri Hildebrand, 2009. "From corporatism to lawyocracy? On liberalization and juridification," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 259-286, September.
    8. Lily Hsueh & Aseem Prakash, 2012. "Incentivizing self‐regulation: Federal vs. state‐level voluntary programs in US climate change policies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 445-473, December.
    9. Anderson, C. Leigh & Kagan, Robert A., 2000. "Adversarial legalism and transaction costs:: The industrial-flight hypothesis revisited," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Asif Efrat & Abraham L. Newman, 2020. "Intolerant justice: ethnocentrism and transnational-litigation frameworks," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 271-299, January.
    11. Frans Van Waarden, 2009. "Power to the legal professionals: Is there an Americanization of European law?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 197-216, September.
    12. Gerhard Schnyder & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Investigating New Types of 'Decoupling': Minority Shareholder Protection in the Law & Corporate Practice," Working Papers wp502, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    13. Christopher A. Whytock, 2022. "Transnational Litigation in U.S. Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Reassessment," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 4-59, March.
    14. Michael Howlett, 2009. "Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(1), pages 73-89, February.
    15. Dietmar Braun & Fabrizio Gilardi, 2006. "Taking ‘Galton's Problem’ Seriously," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 18(3), pages 298-322, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:3:y:2009:i:3:p:235-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.